In fact, given that even iPhoto can't display geotagged photos in Places without an internet connection, I actually prefer the web-based alternatives. For a look at how iPhoto can be used to beautifully display stories without saying a word, have a look at the overview video below.įor those who wouldn't dare touch a Mac, you've a few other options.
It's also worth noting that Apple's Aperture application offers a similar mapping view, for those already using it to manage and edit photo galleries. I do wish that iPhoto allowed for more customization when it comes to viewing shots with Places as it is, you see pretty much everything at once, making it somewhat difficult to view pins specifically from a single trip. Just zoom into a pin, hover to see the locale, and click in to see the images that were taken at that point. If you're familiar with navigating via Google Maps, you'll be right at home here. (If you haven't guessed by now, these GPS modules aren't what I'd call "cheap.") Mapping your results For example, I recently took Solmeta's N3 for a spin on Nikon's D3S (though the company makes models for a huge swath of Nikon bodies) and found it to be far superior to other alternatives, despite costing "only" $189. Most major DSLR manufacturers offer GPS add-ons from $150 to $300, but oftentimes, the first-party solutions aren't the best. So long as you confirm that you have a fix prior to shooting, each image will boast precision location metadata right out of the memory card. The upside, however, is that there's no mess after shooting. The downside here is that you'll need to carry around an accessory, and generally, it sucks battery life from the camera itself in order to keep track of your whereabouts. My preferred method is using a direct-connect module - a GPS device that's specifically made for a camera body, enabling it to tap right into the camera's menu system and embed location data directly onto each image. But go ahead and be prepared to deal with missed tags, inaccurate readings and lots of consumed time syncing metadata after a shoot. If you have extraordinarily specific camera needs - using a body that has no compatible direct-connect GPS logger - it's still better than having no geolocation data at all. It's an absolutely painful and tedious process so much so that I'd just outright not recommend it.
#Geotagged photos google earth software#
Then you're forced to use any number of software programs to sync up the time data from your Bluetooth logger with your image gallery. These units effectively capture time and geolocation data independent of your images. Solmeta's N3 geotagging module atop Nikon's D3SĪn option that's more universal is a Bluetooth-based geotagging accessory.
0 kommentar(er)
